Official No One Left Behind Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 320263084
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Santa Ana, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7143560760
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- AIDS
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $108,283
- Expenses
- $87,826
- Assets
- $8,564
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOYCE HALL (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOYCE HALL (PRESIDENT)
- JUANITA STOCKER (VICE-PRESIDE)
- MARIA MORALES (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Official no one left behind is a non- profit organization that serves families in orange county and surrounding cities. We assist families by offering food, basic staples and other essentials to live.
What it reported doing in 2014
Official no one left behind has added a new mobile stomp out hunger food program feeding 100-150 plus homeless individuals and families hot meals weekly. Official no one left behind stomp out hunger mobile food pantry program is distributing food to low income families and seniors. We are partnered with the orange county food bank (community action partnership), we work closely with caring corporate partners that donate surplus food and other supplies. Official no one left behind wholly-owned subsidiary, onolb transportation, picks up in-kind contributions from corporate warehouses and brings them back to official no one left behind distribution center. The items are distributed directly to families in need. Through the generosity of committed partners, official no one left behind delivers much needed necessities to seniors, children and their families every month.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 20
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 18.6%; rating input score 19
- Program expense ratio: 23%; rating input score 23
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.9%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 18.6% of revenue deployed · 23% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $20K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 19/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.