Official Committee of French-american Organizations

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
473759001
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Cultural, Ethnic Awareness

Reported finances

Revenue
$-15,869
Expenses
$3,128
Assets
$26,338

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Chloe Soroquere (President)

People named in this filing

  • Chloe Soroquere (President)
  • Elie Asmar (Treasurer)
  • Anne-Caroline Floch (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the Organization is to assist the French community in the San Francisco Bay Area in the preservation of the French heritage; to plan sponsor and organize the Bastille Day Celebration in San Francisco on the second Saturday in July; to assist in receiving and welcoming French dignitaries and to organize such receptions lectures community and cultural events and such other functions as would be in the furtherance of its purpose.

What it reported doing in 2024

Bastille Day Festival - In 2023 the Committee was unable to organize a Bastille Day Festival due to increased costs as a result of inflation and the inability to raise sufficient funds to cover the festival costs. However the Committee organized a dinner-dance event that brought 90 association members together to celebrate the French National Day.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -119.7%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.42; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: -19.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.