Off the Mat Into the World
Legal name: Off The Mat Into The World DBA OTM Off the Mat
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 593841326
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2022
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3104032948
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,007
- Expenses
- $57,788
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- Anita Akhavan (Executive Dir.)
- Hala Khouri (Chair/MngingDir)
- Susanne Miller (Treasurer/CFO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To train and support leaders who use embodied practices like yoga and meditation to foster self-awareness and systemic change, building a network of people committed to serving their communities in conscious and sustainable ways.
What it reported doing in 2022
OTM's Yoga, Purpose & Action Intensives provide participants with a training forum through which individuals can learn how to create sustainable activism within his/her community. The intensives (mostly virtual in 2020) train about 100 individuals per year. OTM also sponsors a variety of on line trainings that provide a variety of different curricula related to yoga and social justice (attendees range from 10 to 500 per course.) These trainings are priced on a sliding scale to provide anyone the ability to participate.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 2
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 45.2%; rating input score 45
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1,054.1%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 49.3%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 45.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $26K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.