Odyssey Life Changing Institute
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263232591
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2013, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Cypress, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2818913365
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services for Adolescent Parents
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,000
- Expenses
- $750
- Assets
- $4,250
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jacquelyn Jackson (President)
- Jo Ann Stiner (Vice President)
- Dandridge Murray (2nd Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Jacquelyn Jackson (President)
- Jo Ann Stiner (Vice President)
- Dandridge Murray (2nd Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of this organization is to assist teenage girls that are pregnant or parenting by teaching them life skills, job skills, how to be accountable and reasonable so that they won't have to depend on their friends, family nor federal government to sustain themselves.
What it reported doing in 2013
Able to positively prevent 8 middle school teenage mothers from dropping out of school by working with their families to influence better decision making skills
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 87
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 37.5%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 81.2%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.67; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 175% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 120% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 123.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 37.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.