Oconee Valley Healthcare Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 582639942
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Greensboro, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7064531201
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,137,065
- Expenses
- $17,918,030
- Assets
- $13,807,993
- Liabilities
- $6,755,869
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVE RINGER (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVE RINGER (CEO): $455,380 total reported compensation
- STEPHANIE MYERS (CFO): $213,854 total reported compensation
- CARRI THOMAS (COO): $213,784 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mission: to provide high-quality and cost-effective healthcare to the entire community. Vision: our vision is to foster a healthy and prospering community, allowing individuals to reach their highest potential for their health, wellness, and profession. Our values: honesty; integrity; quality; safety; stewardship; team- oriented
What it reported doing in 2025
Oconee valley healthcare has an in-house pharmacy for our patients. We are a 340b pharmacy, which means that we are able to provide more comprehensive services, and drug manufacturers agree to provide drugs at significantly reduced prices. Our pharmacy offers many free medications (including antibiotics), has a 5 prescription program, and excellent customer service. We have individualized medication therapy management, and we specialize in diabetes treatment and supplies.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.5%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 51.5%; rating input score 52
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.6%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.49; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.5% of revenue deployed · 51.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $9.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $455K · 13 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.