Oceanside Hose Company Number One of Oceanside New York Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
116022810
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Oceanside, NY, USA
Phone
5169246520
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fire Prevention

Reported finances

Revenue
$116,713
Expenses
$81,435
Assets
$316,133
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANTHONY ARTINO (LIEUTENANTVICE PRESIDENT)
  • ANDDREW WRIGHT (LIEUTENANTVICE PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN TRAVERSO (TRUSTEEVICE PRESIDENT)
  • PATRICK MADDEN (TRUSTEEVICE PRESIDENT)
  • ROBERT DAWSON (TRUSTEEVICE PRESIDENT)
  • DOUGLAS TYERS (TRUSTEEVICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • PATRICK MASSIMILLO (CAPTAINPRESIDENT)
  • ANTHONY ARTINO (LIEUTENANTVICE PRESIDENT)
  • ANDDREW WRIGHT (LIEUTENANTVICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary mission of Oceanside Hose Company No 1 is to recruit train retain and provide motivated and qualified firefighters to the Oceanside Volunteer Fire Department In 2025 Oceanside Hose Company conducted over 50 training sessions and responded to 711 alarms of fire or other emergencies The Oceanside Fire Department responded to 2385 alarms of fire or other emergencies Oceanside Hose Company recruited one new member in 2025

What it reported doing in 2025

Oceanside Hose Company manages the Kenny Marino Memorial Scholarship Fund which paid out two one-time 750 scholarships to graduating high school seniors who are descendents of firefighters residing in Oceanside

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30.2%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.88; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -30.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.