Oc Health Peers

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
851096194
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
La Habra, CA, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Expenses
$1,406
Assets
$94
Liabilities
$1,500

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Leticia Castro (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Leticia Castro (Executive Director)
  • Nedjma Baazizi (Grant Writer Research Specialist)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We do not make profit from services paid or grants received. All functions got to fair wages and operational costs.

What it reported doing in 2023

All expenses were from IRS and Operational Fees. The executive director took out a business loan to pay for these expenses. The goal is to meet exemption and then qualify for government grants. The team has worked on several proposals but has not been able to officially apply since there needed to be tax verification. This was not due at the time but left us not to meet the application deadlines. Next year we hope be able to fully operate with grant money. As of now all labor has been voluntary. With more funds we will be able to implement our healthcare policy research projects and provide no charge services to certain communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 15.96; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.