Obstetrical Society of Philadelphia
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232561281
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Swarthmore, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4843438199
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Reproductive Health Care Facilities and Allied Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $66,519
- Expenses
- $85,813
- Assets
- $124,117
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JASON BAXTER MD (PRESIDENT)
- HELEN M WIDZER MD (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- DIPAK DELVADIA (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARJORIE A ANGERT DO (PAST PRESIDENT)
- ALBERT EL-ROEIY MD (PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JASON BAXTER MD (PRESIDENT)
- HELEN M WIDZER MD (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- DIPAK DELVADIA (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To devote its resources to the study of obstetric diseases and their control through discussion and investigation of the scientific and social problems; to provide a forum for the dissemination of knowledge of the obstetric diseases and to consider and act upon matters of interest to the practice of obstetrics.
What it reported doing in 2013
The organization holds meetings to discuss the most current obstetrical medical issues, free discussions and teaching obstetric methods and principles among the members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -29%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.45; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -26.3% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -13% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 26 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.