Obesity Treatment Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 900730509
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Centennial, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3037702526
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Medical Research N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $770
- Expenses
- $2,313
- Assets
- $97,282
- Liabilities
- $329
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TERESA FRAKER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- LYDIA ALEXANDER MD (PRESIDENT)
- HAROLD BAYS MD (PRESIDENT - ELECT)
- MARISA CENSANI MD (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ANGELA FITCH MD (PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TERESA FRAKER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- KATIE TISS (OPERATIONS SPECIALIST)
- LYDIA ALEXANDER MD (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support certain functions of, and to carry out certain charitable and educational purposes of the obesity medicine association, including to foster, fund, and enable research in the field of obesity and to educate the public, professionals, and government in the nature of obesity.
What it reported doing in 2024
To support certain functions of, and to carry out certain charitable and educational purposes of the obesity medicine association.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -200.4%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 42.06; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -26.2% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.