Oasis Resource Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824870212
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Troy, MO, USA
- Phone
- 6363584105
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Counseling
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $589,303
- Expenses
- $225,259
- Assets
- $1,224,865
- Liabilities
- $4,370
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CYNTHIA SPEER (PRESIDENT/BOARD MEMBER)
- TAMERA STAGGS (VICE PRESIDENT/BOARD MEMBE)
People named in this filing
- CYNTHIA SPEER (PRESIDENT/BOARD MEMBER)
- TAMERA STAGGS (VICE PRESIDENT/BOARD MEMBE)
- DIANE WOODWARD (SECRETARY/BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Oasis resource center is a christ-centered ministry that communicates biblical truth to women and men involved in unplanned pregnancies. We offer compassionate care and free services with a goal of empowering clients to make life-affirming decisions, as well as developing or enhancing productive life skills.
What it reported doing in 2025
Earn while you learn/baby boutique - clients are provided training/education opportunites such as parenting, budgeting, cooking, resume & job search. In return, clients then earn "baby bucks" to shop in the baby boutique for clothing, cribs, bottles, etc.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 45
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 31.6%; rating input score 32
- Program expense ratio: 82%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 61.8%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.44; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 30.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 25.3% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 33.9% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 31.6% of revenue deployed · 82% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $185K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.