Oasis House

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320793206
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Ontario, OR, USA
Phone
5417096792
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Homeless Shelters

Reported finances

Revenue
$91,475
Expenses
$10,955
Assets
$90,520
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Glenn Blankship (board president)
  • Anna Tanner (Board vice president)
  • Annette Anderson (past board president)
  • Kylie Schroeder (board member, new president at filing)
  • David Armstrong (Executive director)

People named in this filing

  • Glenn Blankship (board president)
  • Anna Tanner (Board vice president)
  • Nancy Hines (board secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To feed, shelter Ontario's homeless people and children.

What it reported doing in 2025

Annual performance: 12,187 meals were served, 9110.5 volunteer hours were worked, 22,276 bags of hygiene products were handed out, almost 500 new coats were given to those needing one, and 13,408 articles of clothing were given to our clients. Also delivered to our clients with pets were over 2000 bags of cat and dog food. With the amazing videos we made introducing our clients to our city, we were able to generate interest and received hundreds of messages about what love and care were delivered by Oasis House.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 87
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 88%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.26; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.