Oasis Fresh Foundations
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 863340212
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Tulsa, OK, USA
- Phone
- 9188124049
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,600,666
- Expenses
- $953,291
- Assets
- $913,574
- Liabilities
- $30,989
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AARON M JOHNSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- AARON M JOHNSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $198,055 total reported compensation
- CHARLOTTE LOVE (PROGRAM DIRECTOR): $156,896 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Community transformation and humanitarian services
What it reported doing in 2024
Distributed food and conducted monthly "first saturday" programs designed to bring the minority community of tulsa, Oklahoma together in prosperity and in conjunction with neighboring communities. Provided food for thanksgiving and christmas outreaches. Distributed gift cards for food to approximately 2,100 individuals in tulsa, ok. Also, donated funds to other 501(c)(3) organizations to help further our exempt purpose through the program services they provided.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 50
- Accountability: 33
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.7%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 90.1%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 6.8%; rating input score 7; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 40.4%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.96; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 37.2%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -29% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -22.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.7% of revenue deployed · 90.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $859K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $198K · 5 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.