Oakland Primary Health Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 760710111
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018
- Location
- Pontiac, MI, USA
- Phone
- 2483226747
- Rating
- 32
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $63,077
- Expenses
- $0
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ART MCCLELLAN (PRESIDENT)
- STEVEN GRANT (CEO)
People named in this filing
- ART MCCLELLAN (PRESIDENT)
- BETTY YANCEY (VICE PRESIDE)
- SCOTT CRABILL (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Oakland primary health services is dedicated to providing comprehensive, quality, culturally sensitive primary and preventive health care services for all people. Ophs works to improve health disparities in our community by focusing on infant wellbeing, teen pregnancy, asthma, diabetes, oral health, integrated behavioral health, women's health and the many other health conditions affecting our patients.
What it reported doing in 2018
Providing comprehensive, quality, culturally sensitive primary and preventive health care services for all people. Ophs works to improve health disparities in our community by focusing on infant wellbeing, teen pregnancy, asthma, diabetes, oral health, integrated behavioral health, women's health and the many other health conditions affecting our patients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 24
- Sustainability: NotEnoughData
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13.8% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed
- Governance: 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.