Oakland Museum of California

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453138892
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Oakland, CA, USA
Phone
5103188551
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Museum, Museum Activities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,373,397
Expenses
$20,352,008
Assets
$84,358,677
Liabilities
$4,759,814

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

46 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LORI GRANT FOGARTY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • LORI GRANT FOGARTY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & CEO): $324,771 total reported compensation
  • KIMBERLY O CARIM (DEPUTY DIRECTOR & CFO): $220,855 total reported compensation
  • MAKEDA D BEST (DEPUTY DIRECTOR, CURATORIAL AFFAIRS): $210,518 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The museum's mission is to inspire all californians to create a more vibrant future for themselves and their communities. Through collections, exhibitions, education programs, and public dialogue, we inspire people of all ages and backgrounds to think (cont. On sch. O) creatively and critically about the natural, artistic, and social forces that characterize our state and influence its relationship to the world.

What it reported doing in 2024

Core galleries and special exhibitions: in total, the museum served 180,844 visitors this year, and a membership of nearly 8,000 households. Approximately 90% of the museum's visitors are residents of the san francisco bay area, with 53% identifying as people of color. 50% of visitors experienced omca at a free or discounted rate.the museum has galleries of California history, California art, and California natural sciences to display the core collection, as well as two spaces for temporary exhibitions. The museum is continually rotating objects in its three core collections (cont. On sch. O) galleries and typically hosts two to three temporary exhibitions per year. Interdisciplinary interpretation is provided by object and thematic labels, audiovisual presentations, interactive computer and video terminals, self-guiding brochures, and facilitated experiences.in fy25, omca developed and exhibited calli: the art of xicanx peoples, which opened on june 14, 2024 and closed january 26, 2025. This major exhibition combines photography, sculpture, painting, installation, poetry, and more to collectively construct a calli, or "xicanx home" that holds the sacred stories of xicanx peoples from past to present day. Omca worked closely with several contemporary artists to create site-specific installations for the exhibition, including consuelo jimenez underwood and rafa esparza. These works are presented alongside posters from the collections of late queer chicana activist and professor margaret "margie" terrazas-santos. Omca acquired santos' poster collection, titled calli americas, in 2022. Omca also developed and exhibited born of the bear dance: dugan aguilar's photographs of native California, which opened on november 8, 2024 and closed on july 13, 2025. Indigenous photographer dugan aguilar's powerful photography documents a rich array of indigenous experiences from 1982 to 2018, from breathtaking California landscapes to native californian gatherings, ceremonies, and basket weaving. Aguilar's extensive photographic archive was gifted to omca by aguilar's family in 2022, and this exhibition was drawn from these archives, which showcase moments of profound cultural significance and unyielding vitality in contemporary indigenous californian life.omca undertakes extensive visitor evaluation to measure the impact of its programming on both individual audience members and on the community at large. When surveyed, visitors respond positively both to the museum's impact on their personal experience as well as their sense of social cohesion while visiting.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 77.1%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.67 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -17.1%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.14; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.1%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90% of revenue deployed · 77.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 36 of 36 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $15.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $325K · 46 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.6M reported
  • Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.