Oakland City University
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 350869063
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Oakland City, IN, USA
- Phone
- 8127491243
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Undergraduate College (4-year)
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $23,711,358
- Expenses
- $27,715,732
- Assets
- $55,770,352
- Liabilities
- $22,304,181
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR RON DEMPSEY (PRESIDENT)
- REV CLINT WOOLSEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DR RON DEMPSEY (PRESIDENT): $269,097 total reported compensation
- CATHY ROBB (DEAN OF SCHOOL OF BUSINESS): $129,979 total reported compensation
- REV CLINT WOOLSEY (VICE PRESIDENT): $107,682 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide higher education in a christian based learning environment.
What it reported doing in 2023
Oakland city university is an independent, privately endowed general baptist church-affiliated university. The university provides educational opportunities in the liberal arts as well as in selected professions, offering both graduate and undergraduate degree programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 90% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 47% for direct work, and 53% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 87
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 72.3%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.21 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.9%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.01; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.4; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 72.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 17 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $20M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $269K · 21 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $5.4M reported
- Consistency: 46 of 46 current checks pass
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.