Oakhurst Elementary School Pta Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454914481
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Decatur, GA, USA
- Phone
- 6086950197
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $51,538
- Expenses
- $57,110
- Assets
- $83,587
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRITTANY LORENTZ (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BRITTANY LORENTZ (PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER LOM (SECRETARY)
- KATHRYN LEE (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The oakhurst pta supports the teachers, staff, parents, and families at oakhurst elementary in decatur, Georgia. The mission of the pta is to make every childs potential a reality by engaging and empowering families and communities. The pta coordinates with school administration, staff, and other stakeholders to achieve shared goals and support enriching the lives of our students.
What it reported doing in 2024
The pta consists of school staff and family members who work together to achieve a shared vision. We conduct fundraising efforts and set a budget to use the funds that are raised to support the staff, students, and greater oakhurst community. Our major fundraising efforts are an annual auction, a read-a-thon, a book fair, and the sale of spiritwear. All expenditures are approved by the pta board. Provided funding to support classroom enrichment activities, provided staff appreciation, held events to garner community support and help families create connection to the school and connection to other families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 56% for direct work, and 44% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 96.7%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.8%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.46; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $55K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.