Oakdale Pto

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270099226
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Brandon, MS, USA
Phone
6019925442
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$39,068
Expenses
$37,035
Assets
$12,527
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Brina Hayes (President)
  • Crystal Riddle (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Brina Hayes (President)
  • Crystal Riddle (Vice President)
  • Amanda Doby (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Advancement of Educational Environment at Oakdale Elementary School: Oakdale PTO is dedicated to promoting the welfare of children and youth in home, school and community and to bring into closer relationship the home and the school. The PTO organizes several fundraisers each year to support activities and provide materials for the Oakdale Elementary School. Some of these fundraisers involve selling products (i.e. candy, wrapping paper). All the fundraisers are carried out entirely or by volunteers and the fundraisers are conducted only for short periods of time.

What it reported doing in 2017

Purchase of special event materials student awards and graduation events, and office supplies benefiting 620 students and the faculty at Oakdale Elementary School. Oakdale PTO promotes student academic achievement, student physical achievements, and social skills through Oakdale Elementary Cougar of the Quarter breakfasts, Kindergarten Graduation, Homecoming Float, Playground Resurfacing, Water Fountains, Building Improvements, and Annual Fall Event.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 93% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.2%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $57K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2010 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.