Oak Ridge High School Theater Arts Booster Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383708565
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- El Dorado Hills, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9169346885
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $95,641
- Expenses
- $84,828
- Assets
- $40,343
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CLAUDIA VIDOVIC (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JAMES ALBERTONI (MEALS & CONS)
- JAY ESTRERA (FUNDRAISING)
- REBECCA LABAU (VP FINANCE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organizations purpose is to provide financial and organizational support to the oak ridge high school theater arts department, promote interest and backing from the school board, faculty, students, and community, and strengthen the connection between parents, students, and department staff through active parental involvement.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization supported the theater arts department and its director by operating concession stands during performances, managing ticket sales, providing meals for the cast and crew, supplying necessary materials, promoting events, and offering general assistance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 64% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.2%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 96.1%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.3%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 33.1% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 31.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.8% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.2% of revenue deployed · 96.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $81K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.