Oak Middle School PTA

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
330666484
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Los Alamitos, CA, USA
Phone
5627994750
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$131,023
Expenses
$108,959
Assets
$79,775

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Amanda Drukker (President)
  • Angela Benveniste-Evans (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Amanda Drukker (President)
  • Angela Benveniste-Evans (Vice President)
  • Shannon Reilly (VP-Ways & Means)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Child advocacy - support the students at oak middle school

What it reported doing in 2024

INSTRUCTIONAL AND ENRICHMENT SUPPORT: TECHNOLOGY, MEDIA CENTER, SPORTS CLUBS, READING, AND ART PROGRAM SUPPORT; PARENT EDUCATION, LEGISLATION INFORMATION, SEX AND DRUG EDUCATION; COMMUNITY PROGRAMS.Funds are raised to support Oak Middle School students, faculty and staff. We fund innovation grants for teachers, programming and activities for students such as lunch clubs, STEAM activities, school dances and activities as well as classroom supplies/upgrades.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.5%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 98%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.8%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 81.5% of revenue deployed · 98% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $107K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.