Oak Meadows Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202706801
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Murrieta, CA, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$48,022
Expenses
$41,519
Assets
$29,006

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Nicola Silva (President)
  • Kevin McMillin (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Samantha Robles (Treasurer)
  • Nicola Silva (President)
  • Kevin McMillin (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Be a supportive group for all students at Oak Meadows Elementary School by working through selected committees organized to improve teaching, learning, safety and school climate. Plan and direct various fundraising activities to provide funds for committees, technology, field trips, safety, campus beautification and student incentives.

What it reported doing in 2018

The Booster has achieved the following for the 2016-2017 school year: Assemblies, Family events, Campus Beautification, Leader Books, Classroom support, Awards, Grandparents Day, 100 mile club and provided school supplies. The Booster also ran fundraisers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.5%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 44% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 37.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2016 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.