Oak Harbor Youth Sailing Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 202697673
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Oak Harbor, WA, USA
- Phone
- 3603331912
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Safety Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $107,910
- Expenses
- $98,048
- Assets
- $142,344
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM WEINSHEIMER (PRESIDENT)
- SCOTT ELLIS (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- WILLIAM WEINSHEIMER (PRESIDENT)
- SCOTT ELLIS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JEFFERY BARABAN (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Sailing education for youth and teens
What it reported doing in 2025
The wildcat racing program is designed t give students of the summer camp program an opportunity to take their skills to a higher level. The team participates in nwisa district competitions in Washington and Oregon. Team members practice multiple times a week practicing drills and races in the waters of oak harbor bay. The practices are coached by certified insructors and volunteers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 89% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and total assets are large relative to annual expenses, but may not be spendable cash. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.7%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 42.4%; rating input score 42
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.1%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.45; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -22.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.5% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.7% of revenue deployed · 42.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $42K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.