Nysnobiometrix

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
854125002
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Mill Valley, CA, USA
Phone
6692229026
Rating
96
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nerve, Muscle and Bone Diseases

Reported finances

Revenue
$83,663
Expenses
$112,112
Assets
$54,908
Liabilities
$2,913

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DAVID GIANNINI (DIRECTOR)
  • MICHAEL HANLEY (DIRECTOR)
  • JENNIFER JOHNSTON (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Nysnobiometrix's mission is dedicated to the research, collaboration and advocacy of parkinson's disease and cns disorders. Through our organization, we support a national and international network of non-profit research experts, as well as the global community of parkinson's disease patients.

What it reported doing in 2024

Funded the development of an online engagement platform and database for the medical, scientific, and parkinson's disease patient communities. It will serve as a scientific research aggregation platform and a means for interactions between the different communities that are affected by and seek to deal with parkinson's disease. In 2024, this platform was completed and research publication was prepared for submission to an appropriate scientific journal for peer review. The data from the platform was presented at several scientific meetings. We also engaged in social media postings to make the public aware and encourage uptake of our platform.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -34%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 49.9% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 33.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 38% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $112K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.