Nypd Communications Technicians - Local 5911
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 991964277
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2024291000
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,311,709
- Expenses
- $1,161,300
- Assets
- $811,475
- Liabilities
- $29,679
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ARISLEYDA SKINNER (PRESIDENT (P))
- SOMALIA EDWARDS (VICE PRESIDENT (P))
- TABITHA SHEPPARD (PRESIDENT)
- KADEEM DENOON (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ARISLEYDA SKINNER (PRESIDENT (P)): $118,063 total reported compensation
- TABITHA SHEPPARD (PRESIDENT): $11,658 total reported compensation
- SOMALIA EDWARDS (VICE PRESIDENT (P)): $10,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote the welfare of the membership and provide a collective voice in the determination of the terms and conditions of employment.
What it reported doing in 2025
To provide training, workshops, and seminars for employees, members, and local officers, which will allow the membership to safeguard, advance, and promote the principles of collective bargaining and the legitimate rights of workers to secure all benefits, whether through political influence, education, or community activism. To commit to the afscme goals of recruiting an army of activists that will collaborate with members and non-members of our local to mobilize them to win fair pay and an elite quality of public service. To create an organizing culture through a foundation of transparency and structure of accountability, such as committee chairs or stewards that will track and review our performance. To facilitate new employee outreach programs, membership drives and blitzes around contract campaigns.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 9
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.5%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.4%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $118K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.