Nyc Kids Rise Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814526739
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Long Island City, NY, USA
Phone
8335437473
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$22,838,660
Expenses
$24,592,706
Assets
$71,803,036
Liabilities
$53,047,642

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEBRA-ELLEN GLICKSTEIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • DEBRA-ELLEN GLICKSTEIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $310,548 total reported compensation
  • KATHERINE MOLINA-POWELL (CHIEF OF ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE): $300,175 total reported compensation
  • SARAH SABLE (CHIEF FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT OFFICER): $293,766 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Nyc kids rise works to expand economic opportunity through a unique, community-driven college savings program in nyc.

What it reported doing in 2024

In fy25, nyc kids rise continued its citywide expansion, bringing in a new cohort of kindergarteners across nyc public schools into the save for college program, extending citywide eligibility to nyc public schools students between kindergarten and third grade. This is the fourth year of citywide operations, and the eigth year of operations for the program. By the end of the year, the program recognized more than 277,000 active participants, bringing in 79,301 new participants during the year. Each newly enrolled student received an nyc scholarship account with an initial $100. Students have the opportunity to earn additional scholarship dollars when their parent/guardians complete additional steps (the building blocks) and through community scholarships. During this fiscal year, nyc kids rise deposited more than $10.2 million into participating students' nyc scholarship accounts, including seed, rewards, and community scholarships.nyc kids rise also continued to provide capacity building, technical assistance and education to families, schools, and communities. In fy25, the organization launched a community-based financial empowerment infrastructure initiative in partnership with three local cbos to expand focus on building block 2 and building block 3 steps with families in two target districts for the program (d30 in queens and d7 in the bronx). Nyc kids rise also held 175 family-facing events over the course of the year between school and district-level events, outreach events in collaboration with resident associations and community based organizations. These events provided information to families and provided technical assistance to complete foundational steps. Nyc kids rise also offered 44 professional learning sessions for the approximately 1000 elementary schools across New York city to support them in their efforts to use the program as a tool for college and career readiness and assist families in learning about the program and activating and viewing their nyc scholarship accounts for the first time.during this time period, nyc kids rise continued to build out its platform for community scholarships, demonstrating how various institutions and organizations can leverage the platform to support students across the city. The second annual alumni community scholarship campaign brought in leadership from nearly 100 nyc public school alumni, represeting every nyc school district, and resulted in approximately $325,000 being invested in the scholarship accounts of nearly 6,000 student accounts.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 65% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 66% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.6%; rating input score 96
  • Program expense ratio: 88.7%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $33.9 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.7%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.92; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.74; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.4%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 31.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 28.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 41% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.6% of revenue deployed · 88.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $21.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $311K · 19 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $318K reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.