Ny Ukrainian Sports Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
834299557
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Brooklyn, NY, USA
Phone
5164453724
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Recreation& Sports N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,230
Expenses
$770
Assets
$8,780

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WASYL ZINKEWITSCH (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • WASYL ZINKEWITSCH (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The ny ukrainian sports club, inc. (nyusc) is a non-profit corporation which was established to serve the community as a charitable organization. The nyscu shall provide and organize sports programs for youth/adult male and female members of the community. Members in the sports club shall participate in the following sports and/or activities inclusive of soccer, volleyball, chess, ping pong, cultural and educational programs. The nyusc will participate in tournaments, associations, and leagues which have similar interests and purpose. Coaching and instruction in the sports activities will be provided. The sports club will preomote character building, physical, mental, and social well bieng. The nyusc will pay fees to join leagues, pay referees, and purchase equipment.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide uniforms, equipment and referees for sports activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 65.5%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.4; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -24.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16.6% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.