Ny Schools Data Analysis Technical Assistance Group Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320290523
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Latham, NY, USA
Phone
6073421734
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$165,598
Expenses
$177,949
Assets
$192,537
Liabilities
$2,500

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DR MEADER PRATT (CHAIRPERSON)
  • JEFFREY LUKS (PAST-CHAIRPE)
  • ABIGAIL ADAMS-SNELL (VICE CHAIRPE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Datag mission is to provide a leadership role in identifying best practices for cataloging, modeling analysis, data privacy and security, and use of data for New York school.to assist schools in understanding performance assessments in order to effect changes in curriculum and instruction to meet New York educational standards. To support the use of data to inform and improve curriculum, instruction, and assessment as well as guide professional development and district comprehensive or strategic planning. To assist in verifying and submitting accurate educational information to the New York state education department and united states department of education. To assist districts in best practices related to data privacy and security.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide leadership, assistance, and support related to use of data and data privacy and security to New York schools.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.7%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 81.5%; rating input score 82

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.5%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 31.7% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.7% of revenue deployed · 81.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $145K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.