NY Loves Kids INC
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 823018392
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Lake Placid, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6072806606
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $46,496
- Expenses
- $71,370
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $20,700
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Brigid Farrell (President)
- Noah Kroloff (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Brigid Farrell (President)
- Noah Kroloff (Vice President)
- Helen Vlassis (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the organization is to educate, inspire and mobilize local communities to work together to reduce child sexual abuse.
What it reported doing in 2024
Produced, coordinated, and/or participated in numerous educational and awareness seminars and panel discussions throughout the country on various issues surrounding childhood sexual abuse. Topics include the effects of child sexual abuse, statute of limitations reform, and the need to support grassroots public education. Created and disseminated educational content and participated in media coverage about child sexual abuse with the intention of increasing awareness to a large audience. We frequently share information through various communication channels including social media, print, tv, and radio.staff invested time and resources in creating and/or participating in local events with child abuse victims, their families, and local public officials.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 13
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -53.5%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -16.1% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -18.3% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.