Ny Community Members in Need Inc Co Brian Kniesly Gibson Dunn Crutcher
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850611664
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2123514000
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $6,155
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GEORGE SCHIEREN (President)
People named in this filing
- GEORGE SCHIEREN (President)
- CHARLES F FELDMAN (Treasurer)
- SUSAN SEO (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ny community members in need, inc. (the corporation) exists to administer a grant program available to those employed at gibson, dunn & crutcher llp as of april 17th, 2020 and who may become employed in the future, as non-attorney employees (employees) who have a special need because they are experiencing particular financial hardships resulting from a disaster currently, the covid-19 pandemic. The corporation will remain in existence to address financial hardships that may be experienced by employees in future disasters. The corporation intends to be funded primarily by donations from individuals, foundations, and other organizations and potentially grants from local, state, and federal governments.the corporation dissolved operations in 2024.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 5
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 12.7%; rating input score 13
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -97.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -120% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -102% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 12.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $781 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.