Nutrition Studio & Diabetes Care Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272761897
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Tracy, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2098323432
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Digestive Diseases, Disorders
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $71,265
- Expenses
- $67,228
- Assets
- $4,300
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Pamela Warmerdam (President)
People named in this filing
- Pamela Warmerdam (President)
- Rebecca Hernandez (Treasurer)
- Michael Mincolla (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide a place for patients with diabetes to come to receive comprehensive care, such as self-management education, supervised excercise (a diabetes specialized gym), as well as diabetes supplies and materials. These services will be available to as many diabetics that we are able to handle, regardless of insurance.
What it reported doing in 2013
Provided a place for patients with diabetes to come to receive comprehensive care, such as self-management education, supervised excercise (a diabetes specialized gym), as well as diabetes supplies and materials.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 65% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.3%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 36.8%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -50.3% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -36.2% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 154.9% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $67K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.