Nurturing Place

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
991503220
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Health Systems

Reported finances

Revenue
$103,168
Expenses
$105,906
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$2,738

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Neil Dumra (Director)
  • Scott Lee (Director)
  • Joy Stoddard (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Nurturing Place is developing accessible community-based infrastructure for mental health and holistic well-being through integrated services including therapy wellness programs and educational resources.

What it reported doing in 2025

Program 3: RESEARCH & FIELD BUILDING FOR HOLISTIC HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE - The Nurturing Place conducted foundational research to define a community-based model for preventive mental health and well-being infrastructure. In partnership with the University of Texas at Austin RGK Center through Project CONNECT the organization produced a white paper Toward an Anchor Institution for Holistic Health. Activities included a review of academic literature analysis of community needs and 15+ stakeholder interviews across mental health public health and wellness sectors. The research identified a critical missing middle between crisis care and self-directed wellness and articulated a model for integrated accessible community-based care. OUTCOME: Established a research-backed framework to inform funders policymakers and partners pursuing scalable preventive mental health solutions.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 12
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.7%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 94.4%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $106K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.