Nursing Institute for Healthcare Design

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
800636229
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Gilbert, AZ, USA
Phone
4802901415
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$107,829
Expenses
$102,549
Assets
$164,054
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELIZABETH JOHNSON (PRESIDENT/PAST PRESIDENT)
  • KEVIN MEEK (PAST PRESIDENT/PRESIDENT)
  • SUSAN BOWER (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • ANGELA BOYLE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • ELIZABETH JOHNSON (PRESIDENT/PAST PRESIDENT)
  • KEVIN MEEK (PAST PRESIDENT/PRESIDENT)
  • SUSAN BOWER (PRESIDENT ELECT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Nursing institute for healthcare design, inc promotes healthcare design standards, promotesinclusion of nurses in healthcare design, provides education programs for it's members and disseminates new ideas for all areas of healthcare

What it reported doing in 2025

Partnerships + education: nihd continues as an evidence-based design accreditation and certification (edac) advocate organization with the center for health design. We are encouraging our members to use the evidence-based design process into their projects by becoming edac certified. Nihd's partnership with emerald expositions and the healthcare design conference + expo continues. In october 2025, we partnered to select educational sessions and planned a workshop for the clinical perspectives track, offering nursing ceus to attendees at the october conference in Kansas city, mo.one of the highlights of 2025 healthcare design conference + expo was awarding the 2nd daisy award for extraordinary nurse leader in healthcare design to tara jernigan. Nihd's partnership with ashe and the pdc summit continues. In march 2026, we partnered to select educational sessions to offer nursing ces to attendees at the conference in houston, tx. Nihd sponsored 4 graduate nursing students from university of Utah to participate in the challenge at pdc summit student challenge in march 2026. This event was held in houston, tx. 8 webinars were hosted and recorded between july 1, 2025 june 30, 2026. These recordings are made available to all members in the online webinar archive.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 40
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 40.2%; rating input score 40
  • Program expense ratio: 40%; rating input score 40

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.9%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.6; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 40.2% of revenue deployed · 40% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $41K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 40/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.