Number Ten

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
882815028
IRS 990-PF coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-PF 2025
Location
Huntsville, AR, USA
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,490
Expenses
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

Human Service Organizations

What it reported funding in 2025

The foundation reported 10 grants totaling $-7,091. The stated grant purposes included rent, meals and travel to doctor for child, and water bill, plus 4 other reported purposes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from contributions.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent charitable-disbursement detail to separate grants from direct work.
  • Includes asset-sale income: Asset-sale income is shown separately from recurring resources when classifying the revenue model.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes to charitable grants and the filing identifies who received its grants. Assets provide a limited cushion relative to annual grants and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: 100
  • Cost Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency: 100
  • Compliance: 90
  • Endowment Health: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: 100%; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: Limited

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100

Compliance

  • Part VII-B activity disclosures: 19 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Pass
    • Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Pass
    • Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Payment to a government official: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
    • Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
    • Excess business holdings: Pass
    • Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
    • Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
    • Attempt to influence an election: Pass
    • Grants to individuals: Pass
    • Grants to organizations: Pass
    • Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
    • Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
  • Filing consistency checks: 8; rating input score 80

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: -2.97; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Grants: 100% of grant recipient detail disclosed
  • Payout: At least 100% grant deployment rate
  • Trustees: Filed trustees detail
  • Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
  • Investments: 0th percentile for endowment coverage
  • Consistency: 8 of 10 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Endowment Health: Endowment-health comparison scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Expense component sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Revenue less expenses did not reconcile in the filed values.