Nucleus Orchestral Program Corp

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
934039235
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Orlando, FL, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Music

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$18,913
Expenses
$20,275
Assets
$3,883
Liabilities
$4,684

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Enn Rene Diaz Malave (President)
  • Eukaris Del Valle Anaholi Sivira (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Enn Rene Diaz Malave (President)
  • Eukaris Del Valle Anaholi Sivira (Vice President)
  • Eddy Gabriel Marcano Rondon (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organizations primary exempt purpose is to offer music education and foster cultural development through structured instruction in musical instruments.

What it reported doing in 2025

Date: December 20 2025 Event: Christmas Stars Symphonic Gala by The Nucleus Orchestral Program Venue: Tohopekaliga High School Auditorium 3675 Boggy Creek Rd Kissimmee FL 34744 Participants: Over 200 students on stage supported by volunteers and program staff Volunteers: 35 Audience: Approximately 800 attendees Program: The Nucleus Orchestral Program presented its Christmas Stars Symphonic Gala featuring youth musicians from the Orlando chapter under the direction of Maestro Benito Liendo. The program included orchestral and holiday repertoire with guest artists and choir performances highlighting the organizations mission to promote youth development community engagement and cultural enrichment through music.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.2%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.21; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -117.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 149.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.