Nuclear Industry Assessment Corp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474574471
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Orange, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7149409901
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $199,652
- Expenses
- $170,738
- Assets
- $142,983
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- MIKE DUNKLEBERGER (CHAIRMAN)
- STANLEY GRIFFIN (VICE CHAIRMA)
- JOYCE B HAMMAN (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The nuclear industry assessment corporations (niac) purpose is to facilitate niac shared audit program. This is a result of an industry initiative to share the results of supplier audits among industry companies, thereby reducing the number of external audits on the supplier. The program is similar to the joint audit program operated by utilities through the nuclear procurement issues committee (nupic) except membership is limited to nuclear industry suppliers, joint audits are not conducted and audits are shared only with member companies which have a bona fide business relationship with the audited supplier. Niac is to provide a cost and quality effective program for the performance of audits (referred to as assessments) and the sharing of assessment results. The niac shared audit program is based on a standardized approach for the performance of supplier assessments, utilizing a standard assessment checklist approved by all members of niac. The assessment checklist delineates those
What it reported doing in 2024
The other accomplishment of the organization is to hold semi annual training events to facilitate the interchange of audit techniques and knowledge of standards among its members during the fiscal year the organization held its annual meeting for its membership in november 2021 in san diego, California which was attended by a majority of the memembers for training and the facilitation of an exchange of audit techniques and knowledge of standards.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.5%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.