Npr Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521795789
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2025132000
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $32,449,175
- Expenses
- $31,662,350
- Assets
- $426,019,528
- Liabilities
- $1,820,706
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
53 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATHERINE R MAHER (NPR PRESIDENT & CEO)
- LEORA HANSER (PRESIDENT (TO 03/25))
- JULIE PARR (INTERIM PRESIDENT (FROM 05/25))
Highest reported compensation
- KATHERINE R MAHER (NPR PRESIDENT & CEO): $697,251 total reported compensation
- DAPHNE KWON (TREASURER): $523,624 total reported compensation
- LEORA HANSER (PRESIDENT (TO 03/25)): $431,687 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The npr foundation (foundation) is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. (npr). The foundation supports npr through various activities (e.g., conducting fundraising events, managing a dedicated endowment). The foundation disburses funds raised, along with endowment earnings, to npr to support its operations, promotion, development, capital expansion, and other valid corporate activities, subject to applicable donor restrictions.
What it reported doing in 2024
The npr foundation (foundation) contributed funds raised, along with approved endowment and board-designated fund earnings, to national public radio, inc. (npr), the foundation's sole supported organization. These funds financed npr's operations, promotion, development, capital expansion, and other valid corporate activities, subject to applicable donor restrictions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 99
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 93%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 97.8%; rating input score 98; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.4%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.46; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.5%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 44 of 45 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $697K · 53 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.