Notre Dame High School of Batavia Educational Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510201919
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Batavia, NY, USA
Phone
5853432798
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$612,940
Expenses
$168,099
Assets
$4,152,930
Liabilities
$7,455

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMES SUTHERLAND (PRESIDENT - RESIGNED DURING YEAR)
  • ANTHONY SCALIA (VICE PRESIDENT - TERM ENDED DURING YEAR)
  • MAURA SPRAGUE (PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
  • JESSICA MAGUIRE-TOMIDY (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JAMES SUTHERLAND (PRESIDENT - RESIGNED DURING YEAR)
  • ANTHONY SCALIA (VICE PRESIDENT - TERM ENDED DURING YEAR)
  • MAURA SPRAGUE (PRESIDENT/TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The notre dame high school educational foundation's function is to raise funds and awareness on behalf of notre dame high school of batavia; provide tuition assistance to students from families with financial need; provide resources to educate students with special learning needs; make the latest in technology available to our faculty and students; and making our entire campus safe and accessible to all students and family members.

What it reported doing in 2024

Scholarships and support for operations of the notre dame high school of batavia.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 36
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 93
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 32.8%; rating input score 33
  • Program expense ratio: 49%; rating input score 49
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 72.6%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 24.71; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 32.8% of revenue deployed · 49% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $82K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 33/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.