VENU Arts and Culture Foundation
Legal name: Notes Live Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 991611193
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2025–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Colorado Springs, CO, USA
- Phone
- 7198955483
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Performing Arts Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $852,428
- Expenses
- $683,654
- Assets
- $194,612
- Liabilities
- $6,999
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHLOE POLHAMUS (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- CHLOE POLHAMUS (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
- HEATHER ATKINSON (TREASURER/DIRECTOR)
- TOBIN KERN (SECRETARY/DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The VENU Arts & Culture Foundation supports local artists, funds grants, and creates cultural experiences that bring cities to life. We are committed to shaping a more vibrant, inclusive city – one incredible concert at a time.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization has been formed for the primary purpose of promoting arts and culture within the state of Colorado. The organization will use, for charitable purposes, the recently-constructed sunset amphitheater located in Colorado springs, Colorado. The organization's focus is to provide a platform for up-and-coming musicians and nonprofit performing arts organizations in an effort to support and foster community music and musicians within the state of Colorado.in addition to producing free community concerts and events, the organization will from time to time make grants to other section 501(c)(3) organizations that further the organization's charitable purposes of promoting arts and culture in the state of Colorado. Recipient organizations will be selected by the organization's board of directors to ensure consistency with the organization's charitable purposes and endeavors. Particular recipients have yet to be selected. Such recipients, and the timing and amount of support to each grantee, will be determined by the organization's board of directors. The organization's board of directors will also establish and adopt any processes and documentation to support and inform grantmaking activities once such activities commence.finally, the organization intends to develop and deliver educational programs to local schools in promotion of professional opportunities in the performing arts. For example, the organization currently plans to present free classes at local schools on various aspects of the music industry, such as how an individual can build a career as a professional musician and the evolution of the music industry. The goal of these seminars is to empower and inform students so that they can envision a viable career in the performing arts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.5%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 95.4%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 49.9%; rating input score 50; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.8%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 197.6% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 189.6% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 9 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 76.5% of revenue deployed · 95.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $652K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.