Not One More Vet Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820651952
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6692370403
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Mental Health Treatment F31 Psychiatric, Mental Health Hospital
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,062,980
- Expenses
- $1,254,685
- Assets
- $1,648,850
- Liabilities
- $72,241
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRIAN BOURQUIN (PRESIDENT)
- ANGELIQUE TSONTOS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ANGELIQUE TSONTOS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $145,299 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To transform the status of mental wellness within the profession so veterinary professionals can survive and thrive through education, resources and support.
What it reported doing in 2025
Forums that seek to rescue isolation and provide personal support from peers. The forums reach over 41,000 individuals from the veterinary industry including: support staff, veterinary technicians, students, and dvms. Lifeboat provides asynchronous, anonymous support by trained peers and mental health professionals. This has almost 2000 users that are supported through a warm line of volunteers who respond within twenty four hours. Veterinary mental health support (vmhs) provides psycho-educational support and individual sessions facilitated by trained professionals to those working within the veterinary industry. These are free services and have reached over 400 industry professionals in 2025. Nomv's educational program provides resources, webinar, skill building activities, and support on wellbeing to the veterinary community. Nomv attended 10 conferences, spoke at over 100 events, and shared online resources with thousands in 2025. Nomv's clear blueprint is a practice certification program supporting the well-being of the community by assessing clinics for ten well-being categories, providing resources and coaching to the community. We have over 100 clinics in process and 43 certified. In 2017, nomv began providing resources to the veterinary community in two forms: financial and resource access. Nomv's support grants provide up to $500 for individuals working within the community who are experiencing food, housing, transportation, mental or physical health insecurities. Applications are vetted by a group of volunteers and administered by nomv. In 2025 we provided over $170,000 in grants. Additionally, nomv supports clinics who have experienced a disaster to remain open and support the community with grants of up to $5,000. In 2025, nomv administered $25,000 in grants
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 79% for direct work, and 21% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.6%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 74%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.75 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 43.5%; rating input score 43; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.31; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.6%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23.1% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 27% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 30.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.6% of revenue deployed · 74% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $929K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $145K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 32 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 43/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grants require schedule f did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.