Northwest Spay & Neuter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
994792751
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Philomath, OR, USA
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Reported finances

Revenue
$130,418
Expenses
$88,885
Assets
$43,934

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Tamara McCuistion (President)

People named in this filing

  • Tamara McCuistion (President)
  • Randi Hamlet (Treasure)
  • Christina Archibek (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We have a driven mission to open a mobile low cost high volume spay and neuter option to serve the public shelters and rescues in areas of need. We will also work to open a base clinic in the Willamette Valley area as funds allow. The goal is to end unnecessary euthanasia in our shelter system the suffering of unowned pets and provide accessible options for all citizens to spay and neuter their pets.

What it reported doing in 2025

Mash Style Male Cat Neuter Clinics - We neutered more than 510 male cats at these mash style clinics assisting Curry Coos Douglas Lincoln Linn and Benton Counties.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61.6%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: 90.3%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 31.8%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 175.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 182.9% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 196.2% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61.6% of revenue deployed · 90.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $80K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.