Northwest Hospitality
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814182278
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Olalla, WA, USA
- Phone
- 8882225240
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homeless Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $128,416
- Expenses
- $131,080
- Assets
- $14,065
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- Anton Preisinger (Chairperson)
- Maggie Brassil (Vice-Chairperson)
- Amy Makela (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Empower positive community engagement with our vulnerable neighbors and their pets through mutual aid and simple programs while educating changemakers that housing is cheaper than homelessness.
What it reported doing in 2025
General homeless outreach and advocacy to vulnerable neighbors including pairs of socks and volunteer litter pickup all the way through vehicle repairs and rent assistance. Many of our services do not have expenses, rather it is a lot of volunteer and donation management. The programs that do have expenses do not break down into neat programs but our impacts are detailed exhaustively on our website. It's estimated that we served over 1000 people in 2025. Some received clothes, others had vehicles they lived in repaired, or needed temporary hotel stays, among countless other large and small impacts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.3%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 96.3%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.1%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.9% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.5% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.3% of revenue deployed · 96.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $126K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.