Northville Rotary Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237063331
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Northville, MI, USA
- Phone
- 2482551589
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $99,643
- Expenses
- $43,989
- Assets
- $375,665
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- ANDREW BOYD (TRUSTEE/PRES)
- TIM STORY (TRUSTEE/SECR)
- MARY K GALLAGHER (TRUSTEE/TREA)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to receive and administer donations, gifts and other amounts received for scientific, educational and charitable purposes, all for public welfare, and rooted in rotary's area of focus: promoting peace, fighting disease, providing clean water and sanitation, supporting education, aiding children and families, growing local economies, and protecting the environment.
What it reported doing in 2024
Grant provided to bridgepointe non profit, to support students at neinas dual language learning academy in detroit, mi. Bridgepointe provides support for at-risk students and families in need, including academic enrichment, field trips and in-school workshops, and school uniform support. Serves approximately 470 students at neinas school.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 52.4%; rating input score 52
- Program expense ratio: 93.6%; rating input score 94
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 55.9%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.54; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 22.8% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.2% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 52.4% of revenue deployed · 93.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $41K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.