Northumberland Fire Co-no 1
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 240677233
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Northumberlnd, PA, USA
- Phone
- 5704523486
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $254,210
- Expenses
- $233,108
- Assets
- $381,126
- Liabilities
- $187,295
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DUANE TROUPE (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL REEDY (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- TINA HERNANDEZ (TREASURER): $5,492 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are a volunteer fire company that seeks to serve the community in protecting and saving lives and property.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community organization donations: halloween community parade candy & prizes - $629; phil lockcuff golf tournament - $150; shikellamy h.s. Sports booster clubs - $100; community easter egg hunt candy & prizes - $1300; community christmas kids party - $906; fastbreaker booster club - $100
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 79% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 88% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 45
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 16
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.7%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 34.5%; rating input score 34
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 62.2%; rating input score 62; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.3%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.63; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.49; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.7% of revenue deployed · 34.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 550 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $80K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $5K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 43 of 44 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.