Northshore Mustang Club
Legal name: Northshore Mustang Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270663062
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Lacombe, LA, USA
- Phone
- 5043304390
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,921
- Expenses
- $17,106
- Assets
- $5,819
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WENDY QUINLAN (PRESIDENT)
- MIKE FREDERICK (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- WENDY QUINLAN (PRESIDENT)
- MIKE FREDERICK (VICE PRESIDENT)
- OLIVA FREDERICK (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are primarily a regional organization of owners and enthusiasts of Mustangs of every model and year, who share a passion for Mustangs (and all Ford-powered vehicles). But, we welcome anyone who has a love of Mustangs, other Ford-powered vehicles, or classic cars in general to join our club. Chartered in 1999, we are a regional club of the Mustang Club of America. We are from the Lake Pontchartrain Northshore and all over Southeast Louisiana and Southwestern Mississippi. Our friendly members share a wealth of knowledge and pride in our cars. But, we are also a very active and socially conscious club. We give back to our community in many ways.
What it reported doing in 2025
Annual car show
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -72.4%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 43% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 23.4% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.