Northreach Healthcare Llc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391999260
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2014
Forms available
Form 990 2014
Location
Marinette, WI, USA
Phone
7157322078
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Group Health Practice (Health Maintenance Organizations)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,220,154
Expenses
$9,567,366
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • C MARK GREGSON (INTERIM CEO)

People named in this filing

  • MARY GATZKE (BOARD MEMBER)
  • SANDRA MACARTHUR MD (BOARD MEMBER)
  • CHRIS WOLESKE (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Northreach healthcare will be the leading provider of compassionate, high quality primary health care in the communities we serve.

What it reported doing in 2014

To provide clinical health care services through health care professionals practicing primarily in primary care specialties. Northreach provides service to marinette county, menominee county, and the surrounding areas. Northreach is a primary care organization with service lines of family practice, ob/gyn, pediatrics, and internal medicine. In 2014, there were approximately 49,640 visits from jan-june. At the end of june 2014, northreach employed approximately 25 healthcare providers and 150 support staff. Northreach is committed to the health of the community and demonstrates that committment thru its charity care policy thru which approximately $17,900 of services were provided at free or reduced costs to individuals who wre unable to pay for service and met certain eligibility criteria.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 71% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 53
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.7%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 76%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.8%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -65.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -18.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.7% of revenue deployed · 76% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 8 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.3M reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.