Northern Virginia Soccer League
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 510206821
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Merrifield, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7039808015
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $167,671
- Expenses
- $142,140
- Assets
- $105,525
- Liabilities
- $123,322
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Shahpour J Eskandary (President)
- Tim Orr (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Shahpour J Eskandary (President)
- Anita Hood (Secretary)
- Dane Merkel (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Northern Virginia Soccer League sponsors, promotes, organizes, advertises and conducts amateur soccer games and events in the Northern Virginia Area. The League is affiliated with the Metropolitan DC-Virginia Soccer Association and through it with the United States Soccer Federation, Inc. (USSF). The League is a member of the U.S. Adult Soccer Association (USASA). Although not a direct member of the Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), the League follows FIFA laws of the game.
What it reported doing in 2015
Sponsored teams for league soccer matches in Northern Virginia and the Washington Metropolitan Area including spring, summer, fall and winter matches.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.7%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 97.6%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.2%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.17; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8.1% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -8.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.7% of revenue deployed · 97.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $139K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2013 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.