Northern Pride Sports Academy Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
473458839
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Bellaire, MI, USA
Phone
2316763559
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Basketball

Reported finances

Revenue
$291
Expenses
$704
Assets
$240

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PAUL C KOEPKE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • PAUL C KOEPKE (PRESIDENT)
  • SASKIA KOEPKE (SECRETARY)
  • JAMES CROSS (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provided formal education, instruction and participation in basketball to all interested youth, including execise, conditioning, skill development, safty and discipline. To promote basketball in northern Michigan due to covid 19 limitations there was limit activity during fiscal year

What it reported doing in 2019

Northern Michigan youths participated in basketball activity that would not be available otherwise. Due to covid 19 limitations there was limited activity during current fiscal year

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.7%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 32.5%; rating input score 33

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -141.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -28.8% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -29.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -37.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.7% of revenue deployed · 32.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $229 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2015 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.