Northern Nevada Youth Soccer League

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
880491128
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Sparks, NV, USA
Phone
7753436877
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$188,764
Expenses
$185,135
Assets
$11,095

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LUIS G SEGURA (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • GUILLERMO PADILLA (TREASURER)
  • LUIS G SEGURA (PRESIDENT)
  • MANUEL MONCIBAIZ (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the organization is to provide a venue in which underprivileged youth may receive and participate in organized team activities and related training in soccer. We strive to provide a safe, healthy, drug free environment in an adult supervised venue where people of all ages and genders from the community may interact and provide mentoring opportunities for personal and phycsical growth.

What it reported doing in 2014

The nnysl acheived registering 1,302 children between the ages of 6 and 17 and an additional 1,194 adults, both male and female. The league completed a summer championship series consisting of 21 weeks of outdoor soccer and an additional 14 week champsionship league. The league conducted the third annual talent showcase to identify young talent between northern Nevada and la universidad autonoma de guadalajara with the club tecos of the premier division of soccer in mexico. Activities included training as referees, trainers, physical development and league play.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 99
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 98.1%; rating input score 98
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.9%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 27.9% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 98.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $185K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2011 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.