Northern Neck Court Appointed Special Advocate Program Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
542053474
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Lancaster, VA, USA
Phone
8044620881
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Child Abuse, Prevention

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$146,440
Expenses
$115,441
Assets
$198,319
Liabilities
$2,539

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEVE PARKER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • STEVE PARKER (PRESIDENT)
  • CLAUDETTE HENDERSON (VP)
  • JAMIE SEGAR (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Casa is the court appointed special advocate program. Casa is a child advocacy organization that seeks to provide trained volunteers to speak for abused and neglected children who are the subjects of juvenile court proceedings. Casa volunteers advocate for safe, permanent homes for children.

What it reported doing in 2024

Northern neck casa investigates the background and current living conditions of children who have been found to be abused and/or neglected. Casa also investigates children who are found to be "children in need of services or supervision- or "chins." northern neck casa volunteers are court ordered to review all pertinent information about that particular child (medical, school, psychological, social services) and report back to the judge of the juvenile court where he or she, as a trained volunteer, voices his or her recommendations on the best placement for that child. Northern neck casa's main mission is to search for what they believe is in the best interests of the children they are involved with.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.1%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 79.7%; rating input score 80

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.2%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.72; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63.1% of revenue deployed · 79.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $92K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.