Northern California Winter Sports Games

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
872119698
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Saratoga, CA, USA
Phone
4088281068
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$-8,916
Expenses
$45,129
Assets
$73,153
Liabilities
$59,468

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WEI LU (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • WEI LU (CEO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

GrantmakingNCWSG is intended to raise funds and distributes available dollars annually to youth learn to ski and snowboard programs that are carefully vetted, meet competitive grant criteria, and show the most promise for developing pathways for ongoing winter sports participation.SupportNCWSG is intended to work together with grantees to provide the best on and off snow experiences for their youth, engage in ongoing program monitoring, analysis, thought leadership and strategic support, and share and help implement best practices and industry insights.Participation PipelinesNCWSG is intended to work closely with carefully selected grantees to build efficient, effective, sustainable winter sports programs and pipelines to ongoing winter sports participation. Through our partnerships and industry connections, we strive to make winter sports accessible to a broader, more diverse populations and communities

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -606.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.62; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.81; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 85.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -363% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -12.4% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.