Northern California Glass Management Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 680555855
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Danville, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5104289486
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $723,268
- Expenses
- $969,051
- Assets
- $3,728,390
- Liabilities
- $12,724
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARK DUTROW (PRESIDENT)
- BRAD GOETZ (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JEANNIE SIMPELO (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- JEANNIE SIMPELO (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $324,378 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Improving glazing contractors' abilities to better serve the needs of their customers and the glazing industry by providing advocacy, education, and labor relations.
What it reported doing in 2025
Dc star grant program - the grants provide support for a structured contractor safety program that includes occupational safety and health research and information and access to an experienced osha consultant to provide monthly consultation and advocacy services to our glazing and painting contractor companies; a skill up training program for estimators and project managers that includes blueprint reading, paint estimating, paint project management, glass project management and leadership and soft skills classes.in addition, they provide a reimbursement of partial contractor costs of nacc certification and glazing employer agmt testing costs to grow the list of nacc certified contractors and the number of glazing employees that take the agmt test.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 61
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 89.8%; rating input score 90; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -34%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.85; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $324K · 12 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 9 of 10 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.